Claude Opus 5 vs. Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B: comparación de lanzamientos
Comparación de los lanzamientos Claude Opus 5 y Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B: 5 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 7 modelos.
- En inteligencia, Claude Opus 5 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort), con 51, frente a Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning), con 8 de Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B.
Lanzamientos comparados
Inteligencia
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Costo
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Velocidad y latencia
Output Speed
Puntuaciones de capacidades
Índices de capacidades
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Más detalles
Modalidad de entrada | Modalidad de salida | Pesos | Benchmarks de proveedores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) |  Anthropic | 51 | 55 | 57 | 57 | 53 | 54 | 61 | $5.86 | 3,9 US$ | $5.00 | $25.00 | $0.50 | 7275 US$ | 73k | 43k | 140M | 55 | 62.61s | 62.61s | 71.64s | 803.97s | - | 1M | jul 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - |   | |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort) | Anthropic | 50 | 54 | 54 | 56 | 53 | 53 | 60 | $4.88 | 3,9 US$ | $5.00 | $25.00 | $0.50 | 5868 US$ | 61k | 35k | 111M | 54 | 26.58s | 26.58s | 35.86s | 700.83s | - | 1M | jul 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) | Anthropic | 48 | 51 | 53 | 54 | 52 | 52 | 58 | $3.61 | 3,9 US$ | $5.00 | $25.00 | $0.50 | 4332 US$ | 46k | 25k | 81M | 56 | 16.08s | 16.08s | 25.04s | 508.17s | - | 1M | jul 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort) | Anthropic | 45 | 49 | 51 | 52 | 50 | 47 | 56 | $2.19 | 3,9 US$ | $5.00 | $25.00 | $0.50 | 2732 US$ | 29k | 15k | 49M | 57 | 5.20s | 5.20s | 13.99s | 308.27s | - | 1M | jul 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) | Anthropic | 39 | 44 | 46 | 48 | 45 | 42 | 50 | $1.10 | 3,9 US$ | $5.00 | $25.00 | $0.50 | 1561 US$ | 15k | 7k | 26M | 57 | 3.04s | 3.04s | 11.84s | 156.93s | - | 1M | jul 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) |  Nous Research | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 70.6B | 128k | ago 2025 | - | Sí | Admite: texto | Admite: texto | - | |||
| Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning) | Nous Research | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 70.6B | 128k | ago 2025 | - | No | Admite: texto | Admite: texto | - | |||