Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen3.8 27B: comparación de lanzamientos

Name: Inteligencia
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparación de los lanzamientos Claude Opus 5.5 y Qwen3.8 27B: 5 y 4 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 9 modelos.

En inteligencia, Claude Opus 5.5 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 58, frente a Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh), con 20 de Qwen3.8 27B.
En velocidad de salida, Claude Opus 5.5 es el más rápido: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 96 tokens/s, frente a Qwen3.8 27B (Medium), con 51 tokens/s de Qwen3.8 27B.
En costo por tarea, Claude Opus 5.5 es el más económico: Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback), con $0.98, frente a Qwen3.8 27B (Low), con $1.91 de Qwen3.8 27B.

Playground de modelos

Lanzamientos comparados


	Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (high with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (medium with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (low with fallback)	Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)	Qwen3.8 27B (medium)	Qwen3.8 27B (low)	Qwen3.8 27B (non-reasoning)
Intelligence Index	58	57	52	48	35	20	17	16	10
Finanzas y contabilidad	59	56	53	51	42	36	29	28	22
Estrategia y operaciones	61	59	58	56	48	39	34	29	16
Jurídico	58	55	52	50	43	33	26	27	22
Salud y medicina	58	56	52	51	45	35	24	23	19
Ingeniería	65	62	58	54	43	28	22	21	17
Economía	62	60	57	54	45	35	29	28	22
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1801	1761	1682	1622	1279	1393	1373	1270	901
AutomationBench-AA	69.5%	65.0%	63.2%	61.2%	52.9%	48.2%	40.3%	30.1%	12.4%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	59.6%	59.6%	56.6%	52.5%	31.3%	5.6%	5.1%	2.5%	0.0%
FrontierCode 2.0	46.4%	43.8%	35.9%	33.1%	15.8%	14.9%	11.5%	12.4%	3.7%
AA-Omniscience v1.1	48	43	42	40	39	−6	−36	−21	−7
GDP.pdf	26.2%	26.6%	28.8%	25.6%	25.6%	16.4%	12.8%	10.4%	5.2%
HLE-Diamond	67.9%	64.0%	55.6%	51.4%	41.7%	15.3%	6.7%	6.8%	4.2%
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)	61.0%	63.0%	58.0%	52.5%	33.5%	4.0%	16.5%	5.5%	2.0%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1	59.0%	61.9%	49.0%	43.3%	24.3%	0.5%	1.0%	0.5%	0.0%

Costo por tareaUSD	$10.04	$6.05	$3.46	$2.45	$0.98	$3.53	$2.16	$1.91	$3.77
Precio de entradaUSD/1M tokens	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50
Precio de salidaUSD/1M tokens	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$3.00	$3.00	$3.00	$3.00
Precio de lectura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10
Precio de escritura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	--	--	--	--

Velocidad de salidaTokens/s	96	83	80	80	79	41	51	48	46
Tiempo hasta el primer tokens	721,30	128,76	47,50	20,87	10,86	4,01	4,09	3,93	4,02
Tiempo hasta el primer token de respuestas	721,30	128,76	47,50	20,87	10,86	52,66	43,23	45,40	4,02
Tiempo de respuesta de extremo a extremos	726,54	134,75	53,74	27,09	17,16	64,83	53,02	55,77	14,99
Tiempo por tareas	1140,53	785,05	469,54	338,09	149,28	1842,60	1579,30	1470,44	902,48

Ventana de contexto	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	256k	256k	256k	256k
Creador	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Alibaba	Alibaba	Alibaba	Alibaba
Licencia	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Abierto	Abierto	Abierto	Abierto
Modalidad de entrada	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto, imágenes y video	Admite: texto, imágenes y video	Admite: texto, imágenes y video	Admite: texto, imágenes y video
Modalidad de salida	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Proveedores						+7			+4

Updated

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidad

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

No publicly available API

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Claude Opus 5.5

Qwen3.8 27B

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

AutomationBench-AA

Costo por tarea (USD, escala logarítmica)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

No publicly available API

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

No publicly available API

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Modelo Avs.Modelo B

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) vs. Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)

Probabilidad de que la respuesta de cada modelo sea juzgada como la que muestra más cada rasgo, según su diferencia de Elo · 50 % es un empate

Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)

Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)

Lexically Varied

100 %

0 %

Literate

93 %

7 %

Natural Sounding

92 %

8 %

Eloquent

85 %

15 %

Metaphorical

85 %

15 %

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen3.8 27B: comparación de lanzamientos

Inteligencia

Velocidad

Costo por tarea

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) vs. Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)