Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5: comparación de lanzamientos

Name: Inteligencia
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparación de los lanzamientos Claude Haiku 5.5 y Claude Opus 5.5: 5 y 5 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 10 modelos.

En inteligencia, Claude Opus 5.5 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 58, frente a Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max), con 36 de Claude Haiku 5.5.
En velocidad de salida, Claude Haiku 5.5 es el más rápido: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max), con 241 tokens/s, frente a Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 98 tokens/s de Claude Opus 5.5.
En costo por tarea, Claude Haiku 5.5 es el más económico: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low), con $0.04, frente a Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback), con $0.98 de Claude Opus 5.5.

Playground de modelos

Lanzamientos comparados


	Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (high with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (medium with fallback)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)	Claude Opus 5.5 (low with fallback)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Intelligence Index	58	57	52	48	36	35	34	30	25	19
Finanzas y contabilidad	59	56	53	51	44	42	41	38	35	29
Estrategia y operaciones	61	59	58	56	39	48	39	37	33	27
Jurídico	58	55	52	50	39	43	37	35	33	27
Salud y medicina	58	56	52	51	37	45	34	32	31	25
Ingeniería	65	62	58	54	42	43	40	36	32	27
Economía	62	60	57	54	44	45	43	39	36	30
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1800	1760	1681	1621	1575	1278	1524	1440	1369	1114
AutomationBench-AA	69.5%	65.0%	63.2%	61.2%	35.4%	52.9%	36.0%	33.7%	28.6%	22.9%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	59.6%	59.6%	56.6%	52.5%	32.8%	31.3%	29.3%	21.7%	15.2%	12.6%
FrontierCode 2.0	46.4%	43.8%	35.9%	33.1%	34.9%	15.8%	29.9%	23.2%	16.1%	8.0%
AA-Omniscience v1.1	48	43	42	40	12	39	8	5	4	2
GDP.pdf	26.2%	26.6%	28.8%	25.6%	20.8%	25.6%	18.2%	17.2%	15.2%	11.2%
HLE-Diamond	67.9%	64.0%	55.6%	51.4%	29.6%	41.7%	28.8%	23.7%	16.8%	14.1%
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)	61.0%	63.0%	58.0%	52.5%	41.0%	33.5%	44.5%	42.5%	30.0%	21.5%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1	59.0%	61.9%	49.0%	43.3%	20.0%	24.3%	18.1%	10.0%	7.1%	1.9%

Costo por tareaUSD	$10.04	$6.05	$3.46	$2.45	$0.41	$0.98	$0.25	$0.16	$0.09	$0.04
Precio de entradaUSD/1M tokens	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$0.10	$4.00	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10
Precio de salidaUSD/1M tokens	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$0.50	$20.00	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50
Precio de lectura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.01	$0.20	$0.01	$0.01	$0.01	$0.01
Precio de escritura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$0.125	$5.00	$0.125	$0.125	$0.125	$0.125

Velocidad de salidaTokens/s	98	84	81	82	241	82	196	187	175	185
Tiempo hasta el primer tokens	700,16	119,09	33,57	16,48	310,72	5,24	67,20	24,31	10,36	7,51
Tiempo hasta el primer token de respuestas	700,16	119,09	33,57	16,48	310,72	5,24	67,20	24,31	10,36	7,51
Tiempo de respuesta de extremo a extremos	705,25	125,03	39,78	22,59	312,80	11,33	69,75	26,99	13,21	10,22
Tiempo por tareas	1132,59	778,91	463,62	336,65	593,47	146,94	441,28	298,26	192,95	97,99

Ventana de contexto	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
Creador	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic
Licencia	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario
Modalidad de entrada	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes
Modalidad de salida	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Proveedores

Updated

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidad

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

AutomationBench-AA

Costo por tarea (USD, escala logarítmica)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Modelo Avs.Modelo B

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)

Probabilidad de que la respuesta de cada modelo sea juzgada como la que muestra más cada rasgo, según su diferencia de Elo · 50 % es un empate

Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)

Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)

Metaphorical

21 %

79 %

Lexically Varied

21 %

79 %

Eloquent

24 %

76 %

Natural Sounding

59 %

41 %

Literate

51 %

49 %

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5: comparación de lanzamientos

Inteligencia

Velocidad

Costo por tarea

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)