Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B: Release Comparison

Comparison of the Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 27B releases: 5 and 4 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 9 models.

  • For intelligence, Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest: Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) at 66, against Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) at 52 for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • For output speed, Claude Fable 5.1 is fastest: Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) at 66 t/s, against Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) at 48 t/s for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • For cost per task, Qwen3.8 27B is cheapest: Qwen3.8 27B (low) at $0.26, against Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) at $0.77 for Claude Fable 5.1.

Releases compared

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1AlibabaQwen3.8 27B

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 饾湉鲁-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 饾湉鲁-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 路 Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Claude Fable 5.1
Qwen3.8 27B
Pareto line

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation鈥檚 cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 饾湉鲁-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation鈥檚 cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Speed & Latency

Output Speed

Output tokens per second 路 Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Capability Scores

Capability Indices

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Agentic Index

Measures performance in agentic workflows, focusing on behaviors like tool use, planning, autonomy, and complex problem solving.

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, Humanity's Last Exam, 饾湉鲁-Banking, AA-LCR 路 Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, 饾湉鲁-Banking, AA-LCR 路 Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-LCR, 饾湉鲁-Banking, Humanity's Last Exam 路 Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, 饾湉鲁-Banking 路 Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, Terminal-Bench v2.1 路 Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-LCR 路 Higher is better

Further details

Weights
Provider Benchmarks
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
66
-
1M
$7.2
66
Not available
Anthropic
View
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
65
-
1M
$7.2
59
Not available
Anthropic
View
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
62
-
1M
$7.2
49
Not available
Anthropic
View
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
60
-
1M
$7.2
48
Not available
Anthropic
View
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
58
-
1M
$7.2
56
Not available
Anthropic
View
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
Alibaba logoAlibaba
52
27B
256k
$0.4
44
馃
DeepInfraCoreWeaveAlibaba CloudMultiverse Computing
View
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
Alibaba logoAlibaba
44
27B
256k
$0.4
46
馃
Alibaba CloudMultiverse Computing
View
Qwen3.8 27B (low)
Alibaba logoAlibaba
43
27B
256k
$0.4
48
馃
Alibaba CloudMultiverse Computing
View
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba logoAlibaba
35
27B
256k
$0.4
48
馃
Alibaba CloudMultiverse Computing
View