Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B: comparación de lanzamientos
Comparación de los lanzamientos Claude Fable 5.1 y Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B: 5 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 7 modelos.
- En inteligencia, Claude Fable 5.1 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback), con 53, frente a Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning), con 8 de Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B.
Lanzamientos comparados
Inteligencia
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Costo
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Velocidad y latencia
Output Speed
Puntuaciones de capacidades
Índices de capacidades
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Más detalles
Modalidad de entrada | Modalidad de salida | Pesos | Benchmarks de proveedores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |  Anthropic | 53 | 56 | 60 | 60 | 58 | 56 | 63 | $7.63 | 7,2 US$ | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | 13.129 US$ | 78k | 47k | 188M | 66 | 298.45s | 298.45s | 306.04s | 742.47s | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 53 | 56 | 58 | 61 | - | 57 | 62 | $5.98 | 7,2 US$ | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | 9063 US$ | 61k | 34k | 121M | 62 | 172.16s | 172.16s | 180.28s | 617.87s | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 51 | 54 | 56 | 58 | - | 54 | 60 | $3.91 | 7,2 US$ | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | 5242 US$ | 38k | 19k | 62M | 55 | 26.22s | 26.22s | 35.24s | 425.79s | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 49 | 51 | 54 | 57 | - | 51 | 58 | $2.98 | 7,2 US$ | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | 3983 US$ | 28k | 12k | 44M | 56 | 9.50s | 9.50s | 18.48s | 310.86s | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 47 | 49 | 51 | 53 | - | 49 | 55 | $2.37 | 7,2 US$ | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | 3158 US$ | 22k | 8k | 33M | 55 | 7.61s | 7.61s | 16.75s | 248.08s | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) |  Nous Research | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 70.6B | 128k | ago 2025 | - | Sí | Admite: texto | Admite: texto | - | |||
| Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning) | Nous Research | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 70.6B | 128k | ago 2025 | - | No | Admite: texto | Admite: texto | - | |||