Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3: comparación de lanzamientos

Name: Inteligencia
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparación de los lanzamientos Claude Fable 5.1 y GLM-5.3: 5 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 7 modelos.

En inteligencia, Claude Fable 5.1 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback), con 50, frente a GLM-5.3 (Max), con 32 de GLM-5.3.
En tiempo por tarea, Claude Fable 5.1 es el más rápido: Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback), con 7,4 min, frente a GLM-5.3 (Low), con 14,4 min de GLM-5.3.
En costo por tarea, GLM-5.3 es el más económico: GLM-5.3 (Low), con $1.57, frente a Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback), con $4.47 de Claude Fable 5.1.

Playground de modelos

Lanzamientos comparados


	Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (high with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (medium with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (low with fallback)	GLM-5.3 (max)	GLM-5.3 (low)
Intelligence Index	50	49	47	43	39	32	23
Finanzas y contabilidad	54	54	50	47	48	42	31
Estrategia y operaciones	56	58	54	52	51	47	38
Jurídico	54	54	50	48	47	36	28
Salud y medicina	51	51	48	45	44	39	31
Ingeniería	57	57	54	50	46	38	28
Economía	58	59	54	51	49	39	30
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1649	1669	1576	1525	1478	1503	1185
AutomationBench-AA	57.8%	59.4%	55.3%	54.7%	52.2%	62.2%	52.0%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	55.1%	52.0%	52.0%	44.9%	40.4%	41.9%	34.8%
FrontierCode 2.0	35.7%	31.6%	30.3%	28.8%	22.8%	21.6%	12.7%
AA-Omniscience v1.1	44	46	40	36	34	6	−11
GDP.pdf	26.2%	26.2%	26.8%	26.8%	28.0%	11.2%	8.8%
HLE-Diamond	58.8%	60.1%	50.4%	45.0%	37.4%	17.9%	17.5%
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)	60.0%	52.5%	62.0%	58.5%	49.5%	33.5%	21.5%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1	40.5%	43.3%	39.5%	29.0%	21.4%	9.5%	3.8%

Costo por tareaUSD	$10.85	$12.99	$7.54	$5.56	$4.47	$5.01	$1.57
Precio de entradaUSD/1M tokens	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$1.40	$1.40
Precio de salidaUSD/1M tokens	$50.00	$50.00	$50.00	$50.00	$50.00	$4.40	$4.40
Precio de lectura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$0.25	$0.25	$0.25	$0.25	$0.25	$0.26	$0.26
Precio de escritura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$12.50	$12.50	$12.50	$12.50	$12.50	--	--

Tiempo por tareaMinutos	19,0	22,3	12,6	9,5	7,4	28,9	14,4
Velocidad de salidatok/s	85	88	87	85	85	69	60
Tiempo hasta el primer token de respuestas	56,10	155,07	15,92	8,33	7,68	71,16	8,06
Tiempo hasta el primer tokens	56,10	155,07	15,92	8,33	7,68	3,18	3,20
Tiempo de extremo a extremoMedia de las cargas de solicitud única (s)	223,22	399,55	117,41	96,95	97,06	173,19	47,51

Ventana de contexto	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
Creador	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Z AI	Z AI
Licencia	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Abierto	Abierto
Modalidad de entrada	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Modalidad de salida	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Proveedores						+19	+3

Updated

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Tiempo por tarea

Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

No publicly available API

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Claude Fable 5.1

GLM-5.3

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

AutomationBench-AA

Costo por tarea (USD, escala logarítmica)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

No publicly available API

Velocidad y latencia

Tiempo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better

No publicly available API

The weighted average time (minutes) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task: output tokens per task divided by output speed, weighted by each benchmark's weight in the Intelligence Index.

Speed and latency metrics average each endpoint's runs over the past 5 days, and the error rate pools them. We run the benchmark every 6 hours, and endpoints of deprecated models every 18 hours.

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Modelo Avs.Modelo B

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) vs. GLM-5.3 (max)

Probabilidad de que la respuesta de cada modelo sea juzgada como la que muestra más cada rasgo, según su diferencia de Elo · 50 % es un empate

Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)

GLM-5.3 (max)

Literate

67 %

33 %

Lexically Varied

62 %

38 %

Eloquent

54 %

46 %

Natural Sounding

46 %

54 %

Metaphorical

49 %

51 %

Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3: comparación de lanzamientos

Inteligencia

Tiempo por tarea

Costo por tarea

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Velocidad y latencia

Tiempo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Time Period

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) vs. GLM-5.3 (max)