AI Chatbots ComparisonBeta
Conversational agents embedded in websites, apps, or messaging channels that answer questions or perform scoped tasks in a chat UI, usually around FAQs, simple workflows, or domain-specific knowledge rather than long-horizon task ownership.
To compare language models see our model benchmarks.
Highlights
Compare Plan Options
| Product | Tier | Price | Model | Intelligence | Inputs | Media Gen | Tools | Memory | MCP | Connectors | Feature Score | Apps | Privacy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Plus | Standard | $20/mo | GPT-5.2 (medium) | 46 | ImagePDFExcelVoice | ImageVideoVoiceV2V | WebCodeDataResearch | MemoryHistory | 9/10 | 4.7/6 | iOSAndroidmacOSWindows | |||
| Claude Pro | Standard | $20/mo | Claude Opus 4.6 (max) | 52 | ImagePDFExcelVoice | Voice | WebCodeDataResearch | History | 3/10 | 3.9/6 | iOSAndroidmacOSWindows | |||
| Google AI Pro | Standard | $20/mo | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 57 | ImagePDFExcelVideoVoice | ImageVideoVoiceV2V | WebCodeDataResearch | MemoryHistory | 5/10 | 4.5/6 | iOSAndroid | |||
| Poe Pro | Standard | $20/mo | Claude Opus 4.6 (max) | 52 | ImagePDFExcelVoice | ImageVideo | Web | History | 0/10 | 2.0/6 | iOSAndroidmacOSWindows | |||
| Perplexity Pro | Standard | $20/mo | Claude Opus 4.6 (max) | 52 | ImagePDFExcelVoice | ImageVoice | WebCodeDataResearch | History | 2/10 | 3/6 | iOSAndroidmacOSWindows | |||
| Microsoft Copilot Pro | Standard | $20/mo | GPT-4o | 44 | ImagePDFExcelVoice | ImageVoice | WebCodeDataResearch | History | 4/10 | 3.2/6 | iOSAndroidWindows | |||
| SuperGrok | Standard | $30/mo | Grok 4.1 Fast | 38 | ImagePDFExcelVoice | ImageVoice | WebCodeDataResearch | MemoryHistory | 2/10 | 3.5/6 | iOSAndroid | |||
| Mistral Le Chat Pro | Standard | $15/mo | Magistral Medium 1.2 | 27 | ImagePDFExcel | Image | WebCodeData | MemoryHistory | 2/10 | 2.8/6 | — |
Landscape Summary
Major providers—Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Meta AI—offer distinct strengths in reasoning, response quality, and features. Most have free tiers plus paid plans ($15-25/mo) with larger context windows, web search, file uploads, and image generation. Market consolidated around these leaders; open-source options like Llama and Mistral gain adoption where data privacy matters.
Differentiators
- Some excel at coding (CodeStral, o1), others at conversational accuracy (Claude) or visual understanding (Gemini).
- Differentiation comes from specialized capabilities—long context, real-time search, voice, multimodal—not base conversation quality, which has reached parity.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Max intelligence supported model
Features
Intelligence vs Feature Score
Price
Intelligence vs Price (Paid Plans)
Monthly Price: Paid Chatbot Plans
Feature Score vs Price (Paid Plans)
Frequently asked questions
Our comparison uses benchmark data including the Intelligence Index, feature scores, context window size, and pricing. You can filter by model, compare plans side by side, and view charts for intelligence vs price and intelligence vs features to find the best fit for your use case.
The Intelligence Index is a composite score based on Artificial Analysis benchmarking that measures reasoning, knowledge, and response quality. Higher scores indicate stronger performance on standardized evaluations. Paid plans typically score higher than free tiers.
Most major providers (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Meta AI) offer free tiers with varying limits. Our comparison table shows feature scores, context windows, and capabilities for each plan. Free tiers often have smaller context windows and fewer advanced features like web search or file uploads.
Key differentiators include long context support, real-time web search, voice input/output, multimodal (image) understanding, and coding capabilities. Some excel at coding (CodeStral, o1), others at conversational accuracy (Claude) or visual understanding (Gemini).
Artificial Analysis publishes detailed LLM benchmarks including latency, cost, and quality metrics. Our chatbot comparison links to model-level data for deeper analysis. View LLM benchmarks